The Patriot Act has a greater purpose than could be imagined.
A case was brought on his behalf against him and other issues that were in violation of his Constitutional rights because he was jailed for so long with no charges filed. The before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him evening. It is believed that this is only done so that the Supreme Court will never hear the full case as the Bush Administration would have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed which had to accomplish with all the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He was charged with lesser much less specific crimes though Attorney General Ashcroft had stated when he was detained that the evidence against Padilla was overwhelming. He was subjected to and the length of time he was detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial before he was set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that because of the torture. A judge ruled he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007) that he was competent and.
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to give it to the 8th of December, giving the ability to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and many other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our constitutional rights. February 28th, 2011 was thought to be the past day of the Patriot Act since no new legislation had been passed. Using this extension, America waits for hearings to be held because of the Judiciary Committee. When it came right down to voting when it comes to extension many Republicans voted because of it and Democrats argued against the extension. However, what was a surprise to many was the undeniable fact that sixty-five Democrats voted for the extension of the Patriot Act. One in particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the best ranking democrat on the Intelligence Committee, wish to see this extension all the way through to 2013. Lots of the 27 Republicans who voted from the extension, such as for example Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American people will face the best danger of out-of-control prosecutions plus the chance for out-of-control spy networks taking effect.
Groups like the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and also the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform of this Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will take benefit of the bill and use of this power to trouble innocent members of the Muslim-American communities. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared ahead of the House subcommittee from the requirement for reform associated with the Patriot Act, arguing that the us government track of communications with no proof is a violation of the American peoples’ basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt because it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability that he would not support the extension. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to obtain reports on intelligence law violations through the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on more than one occasion towards the Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to are accountable to Congress any unlawful investigations under the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are affected by the power for the Patriot Act.
as an example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens seeking to gain permanent residency, citizenship, visas and work permits in the usa are being scrutinized beneath the new requirement system of the Patriot Act. One quite high ranking official in the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) caused it to be clear then they will receive disapproval if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility. More government that is stringent and thorough criminal record checks are simply another obstacle developed by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also go against most of the checks and balances through the Bill of Rights that was put into place to protect citizens’ privacy. A discomfort in what they do because their actions are subject to review if the government suspects they are engaging in anything terrorist related at that time, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet in the privacy of their home feel. For online users, it opens the door for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and systems that are peer-to-peer. Also place in the midst of the arguments are companies and public libraries that need to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, during the request of federal police force agencies, without giving any notification for their customers.
I believe that certain aspects of the Patriot Act are feasible, but just with intensive oversight not just from Congress, but in addition through the Supreme Court. Congress can be the cause by making certain the statutory laws they pass do not not in favor of the protections promised to Americans into the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments associated with the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to ensure the Constitution is upheld even when it comes down to cases that deal with suspected terrorists which can be American citizens. Our laws are making this country what it is but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation today. The freedom of life, liberty and property has converted into greed. Terrorist acts contrary to the US terrify many Americans, but in many cases, money and power scares them more. The people vote to own government representation nevertheless the people must be more a part of your decision making process. If you elect someone to office in addition they try not to do the job correctly, it is up to us as Americans to make sure that the individuals try not to remain in office. That may only be done if people have more active in the process that is political not just be happy with what are the results.
The expression “land of the free” is employed too generously. Just how it is now, the Patriot Act goes against everything that this country stands for and deprives all of us of your liberties that are civil. Some argue you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect things to turn out well that it is necessary to maintain order, but. In the event that Patriot Act is to be kept as law, the folks that we elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate have to hold the people who utilize it accountable who overstep or abuse the ability directed at them. Also, the president really should not be the deciding aspect in deeming a person a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving a person such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.
The History associated with Patriot Act actually goes back to the century that is eighteenth different laws put in place during war time to protect the usa.
The protection of our nation is the highest and the most responsibility that is important of government. The laws created are meant to be into the best interest for the citizens. The power to look after their welfare and to protect them after all, the citizens give the government. Individuals with this known helping with homework online level of power sometimes concentrate on your whole without rational while the individual has to pay the fee. There should be a limit regarding the power of this government, if the way that is nation’s of, liberty and quest for property are in jeopardy we need to look at the rational the federal government uses when governing this nation. We cannot as a nation just sit back and accept what exactly is being done. So that you can elicit change, we have to stand up and do something positive about it.